Al Jazeera Shield, legitimacy and contradictions

In Arab world, we feel many effective sensitivities especially when some country mobilize a battalion of army or police over its borders; however, long decades ago we accept the presence of British, French, American and Soviet military bases and stop explaining these phenomena or the people disapproval.
Kuwait, Jordan and Syria asked before for Arab troops, under the umbrella of the League of Arab States, when they were threatened by foreign or Arab powers. In the division between the leftists of the eastern bloc and the rightists whose relationships with the west are still the same, we remember that during Zafer Revolution in Oman the latter resort to the Jordanian and Iranian (Shahinshah) troops to suppress that revolution.
Today in Bahrain, the situation is different. Some people consider that the troops of Al Jazeera Shield (near 1500 soldier) a foreign interference; others consider it a previous agreement signed by GCC members. In fact, the few numbers of these troops cannot occupy a country with population of more than 2 million and 200000 persons according to the last international stats. Perhaps what provoke the country is not the peaceful protests or sit-ins, but deriving the power from Iran by raising pictures of Khomeini and Kaminey along with striking vital installations. Regardless the mutual accusations of fabricating crises between both parties, the inflaming sectarian will serve neither of them.
Logical freedom of expression if not exceeded is a human right. But in the midst of Bahrain events, how could we forget the Iranian threat as every official starting with Shah Iran then Al Ayat expressed their frank ambitions to establish Iranian Bahrain. Can we trade an independent country with a tribe as happening now in Lebanon by Hezbollah who considers Kaminey the sole source of legislation?
No one deny that both Sunnis and Shiites are living a bad life in Bahrain, but the government makes positive changes for the sake of national union not as Iraq. As the regime overthrow, it will be impossible to happen because all Gulf countries consider it a non-negotiable demand, and their troops will not allow what happened in Kuwait to be repeated again.
It is true that there are many contradictions that highlight the sectarian with danger alarm regarding the national union of Bahrain. However the dialogue suggested by the government is opposed by regime overthrow which made dialogue impossible.
The call for law, legislations amendments, the contributions by all society classes through jobs and powers according to the efficiency and the calling negligent to account are all their rights; but if it extended to raising foreign pictures or mottos, this would cross the red line of the country destiny.