The Holy March is a term named after the Chinese Revolution leaded by Mao Tse-tung; then Al-Gaddafi used this term against Tunisia, Chad and Egypt: once in the name of union and again when raising the figure of the solo leading savior. Perhaps we can consider his ruling 24 years a bloody comedy, since his ruling mind has no potentials but mere hallucinations and illusions which convinced him that he is a gift for the human kind. This is clear in his first fierce speech when he said that Libya is the leader of all mighty powers and the globe center, and he is its ruler. The questions is: what is the guilt of the Arab peoples to live with dictators who were considered the fighters of colonization and raised to be historical leaders, then act arrogantly by nationalizing money and press, managing police government with secret prisons, inflation of the leader balloon to be the solo axis all peoples, properties ideas and minds circling around by ways of murdering ambition and destroying cultural and educational institutions to the extent that the father is hanged to death by an innocent word said by his kid that ends to be a killing series for the whole family?! All regimes, which were demolished by revolutions, were not destroyed by assumptions or slanders. The historians of those eras who record the events did not mention any excess but some material faults which are not compared to what was done by military leaders. Al Gaddafi is the last model who accused the Arabs with historical guilt of no political identity that could make freedom a target and democracy a regime. Perhaps the countries who classified Arabs and Muslims as underdeveloped will revise their judgment when they know that we are looking for a regime which equals rights and duties. The motives behind street policy are not only poverty, unemployment or other demands but also freedom which would be applied by supervising the government, considering the people as the only authority and power. Perhaps the suzerain state is the one who paid the bill of human rights negligence; but I guess that will not be enough. Archives of crimes and monopoly of army, police and secret police will be opened, and this is not a surprise because it started with Shah Iran and will not end with Al Gaddafi. The only worry is that the revolution deviates its way when police or secret powers jump to the first square. These are real worries because the previous regimes had its remaining powers. The odds make theses revolutions turned back the other way. The evidence is what happened to Shah Iran leaders who are now under house arrest or in jails when the revolution was snatched by some turbaned persons under the eyes of revolution protectors which end to semi-military regime under the guise of religion and nationalism.
