Should an Arab summit be held after uprisings?

The world was taken by surprise by the Arab uprisings that occurred unexpectedly and without a warning. This leaves us between the mass protests, challenging authorities and the concerns of those who were optimistic about the outcome and the pessimistic about the future prospects. The view is rather uncertain as the after change alternative is not obvious and the potential leaders who are capable of leading the country are not present. This could jeopardize the uprising and cast negative consequences.
Under the current situation, many Arab countries are exploding and many victims are falling because those in power are clinching to their positions. The course of history shows that such thinking goes against the logic as popular revolts is undefeatable. The current situation, however, raises a serious question about the prospects of the Arab security as a whole.
Removing the regime, justice and true national freedom were the clear objectives of those behind the uprisings, as oppose to tailored rules to sustain regimes. In contrast, we saw the international intervention in Libya, the GCC attempts to resolve crises in Yemen and the by watching to course of events in Syria. Egypt and Tunisia are the only two countries that achieved fragile stability with a big task, achievements and progress awaiting.
The whole situation is unstable, from an Arab point of view, as Iran, Turkey and perhaps Israel are looking for footsteps in the region. The case with Iran was more apparent through interference in Bahrain and the sending of spies to Kuwait. Turkey on the other hand, is threatening and presenting its theory to bridge the gap between the rebels and the regimes in their countries. Israel, who is keeping an eye on the course of events, has exploited the situation to expand settlements while the American president is dealing in double standards and stressing on the strategic importance of Israel.
The problem is that the Arab league initiatives were not keeping pace with the magnitude of events. The secretary general was about to resign in order to be able to run for the presidency in Egypt while his successor needs some time to arrange his priorities. Hence, no calls for major summit that amount to level of previous ones or a serious draft that takes into account the collective responsibilities. The Arab weakness left the course of events to take a simultaneous interaction while left room for many regional and international parties looking for a footstep.
We are aware of the fact that, for several reasons, it is not an easy task to gather all Arab leaders around one table. The cancellation of the summit in Baghdad was due to its siding and alliance with Iran, while, Syria and Libya may not be able to attend. This however should not prevent holding an Arab summit for the remaining majority to discuss Issues openly. The burden imposes several political and security reasons hence, require urgent Arab action to prevent others filling the vacuum.