Who practiced media for, at least, an intermediate period of time, is no longer influenced by speeches of the conflicting parties of our miserable world being broadcasted lively on TVs. What is funny – the Arab World - , or what is published in some newspapers is merely viewpoints displayed for sale. Do not expect that the Europeans, or the East Asians, or those who are geographically remote would be interested in the implication of such speeches or opinions or articles. They have become aware of the expected implication. Therefore, they are heading towards knowing what is to come. As for the Arabic naivety or the excessiveness of optimistic thinking, it is reflected in the West that surmises the birth of new concepts and new pictures of political treatments. Of course none of that is to be. What happened is that the oratorical political controversy and similarity the statements have become an alternative for TV series and concerts. Of course we cannot undervalue the national feelings in such interest being a case taking the mind into dreamy unasserted ambitions of the birth of a new positive reality. You yourself: how do listen to the speeches of the conflicts stars in Iraq, and of those in Lebanon, and to others holding sticks in Sudan, and to some mountain wolves in Yemen, and to other never-satisfied people in Algeria? And it is up to you to inquire until when should the voice and picture of the Liberation Square in Cairo continue before the economy gets back to its previous levels, and work hours to its previous status. If what is settled in your mind is that the language of speech and its proposed concepts in the current situations would bring you solutions for chronicle issues, then you are, with all my respect, in a minor awareness condition, and forgetting is taking over your mind because the many languages of the past – nearly fifty years ago –, in its speeches and the justifications of its conflicts, held slogans that we would not know what their results would be. As for now, we are in front of two cases: negative results bringing in backwardness, incapability, unemployment, and poverty, and the other case where results would bring the birth of the ends of divisions and unrests, and the claim of the legitimacy of the establishment of the sectarian state. In the case neither were the results, the street would be an amazing viewing scene that would bring you several repetitive languages of definitions and justifications. And even if they were glamorous in the beginnings, their repetitiveness and the multitude of the declining curves will make you believe, with such repetitive concepts, that there is no way out towards the best.
