Despite that I got appreciation calls for what I wrote past Thursday titled "Iran first and Israel Second" whether by mobile or fax, but the comments on the other media opposed my viewpoints, and some added additions that I didn't include, but the good will and the rich fellowship is present among a lot of them. A minority wrote with mere personal emotions, but those are a minority. What I wrote was not a personal announcement of replacing the Israeli enmity with the Iranian enmity, where what I clarified is the difference percentage between the two groups, which makes Iran in the more dangerous position. But that doesn't mean that Israel is innocent from practicing enmity, but the enmity behavior between the two groups is very different, where for example Israel that didn't have with the Arab majority, especially the gulf countries, any mutual political relations or fellowship in the mutual interests or the closeness of the one religion, and despite that, it didn't practice assaults against these countries. My talk was about the reality of relations between Iran and the Gulf countries from one side and between Israel and the Gulf countries from the other side. Lets assume that the kingdom - which is in the western borders of the Gulf countries and gives support, understanding and fellowship of the Gulf cooperation- but what if the geographical and economic reality tempted it to add important areas from each gulf countries into its borders? In this case we will not blame any Gulf citizen if he said that Israel that Arabs don't acknowledge its existence and has any closure with Gulf countries became safer from the Saudi neighboring. What is currently happening is that Iran, which is to the eastern border of the Gulf existence, is practicing every once in while its presence in Iraq, which is important for it to not unite in a cooperative society, likewise Emirates that has three islands taken from it by Iran, and its multiple interference in the affairs of Kuwait and Bahrain that lived a lot of dangerous troubles, and then lastly Iran's attempt in what happened in Awamya, and then the attempt of assassinating the ambassador. What can we say: which practices danger more, Iran or Israel? This comparison, or in fact this media confrontation of the Iranian violations doesn't mean excluding Israel from the base of everything enforced on it whether by it conquering the Palestinian land, or because it didn't make a public legitimating the same way it lived under the American support umbrella. I didn't reduce the danger of Israel or its violence method; but I concentrated on the Farsi country project that makes the sect clash just a justification then provoking way, and if you chose the geographical position as an example then we known that since nearly three years Egypt arrested individuals that it confirmed to be performing Iranian roles, and we all know Iran's role in dividing the relations of Lebanon's classes.
