After the publication of the documents, the Palestinian Government has become in trouble; was such information true, the bitter concessions given to the Israeli side are truly harmful and terrific, as in spite of all those generous offerings, they could not but keep insisting on settlement, expanding and transforming the west bank into a big prison, in addition to refuse all initiatives. The question here is what is the reaction of the Palestinian people in the west bank who stand behind the Government after the revelation of these truths? The overview provides Hamas with a moral push and public support being the crosslink with Israel, and the party most harmed by its attacks and blockades. Therefore, the public support will be more on its side than on the Government's, which forms a painful strike not for the semi-dead peace negotiations, but for the occurrence of a political deliberation that does not meet with the goal of the citizen who has been waiting for situations where he would expect himself to be the core of interest. Israel, as well as its reactions, is cold. However, they realize that the Palestinians gave all they have, and that they are a refusing and stubborn party in the peace process. This reveals a reality that might be realized by parties concerned about the case such as America and some European countries. However, they will show up before the public opinion in a contradictory way. The biggest loss is that the motive to stand in Hamas' side will cancel so many things; for Israel, it will become a public patriotic choice, and a new uprising might erupt again for the claims that giving up right, even if initiated by the Palestinian state, is against the public situation. Thus, Israel would perhaps be facing a new upheaval that won't be reflected only in the situations, but also in creating conditions where they thought they were the first winner in humiliating the Palestinians and taking off the biggest concessions from them, and tame them so as not to act in any way against its actions. The new reality in the Arabic arena is to move and confront instead of stay still. Israel does not wish for fair systems that achieve good values in democracy and development to dominate, they, however, find the congestive situations as an objective to tear up this big home. Thus, the Palestinian case will be in the core of events, which will push the confrontation to become bigger and much wider. The Qatari network Aljazeera has risked by publishing the documents. Perhaps it was driven by a media scoop equivalent to that of WikiLeaks. However, the outcome here might either be negative or positive. In a way, it might be negative because this publication caused embracement to the Palestinian Authority, and revealed things that had been considered classified. The Authority might not dispute with Aljazeera, but with the Qatari Government. The situation might lead to a complication with dangerous consequences that might transform into revenge practiced through non-media techniques. It might also be positive because the Arab, and specifically the Palestinian, citizen is not aware of what is going on inside the closed rooms. This thing brings them new and dangerous information which will support the situation of the forces advocating cutting up negotiations, and will also be an advantage for those forces opposing the Authority. Furthermore, this will strengthen rigorism which will attain an Arab, Islamic and international support as a consequence of the Government's situation and its submission to Israel.
