The discovery of suicide martyr videos seemed certain proof that Abd Al-Rahim Abdul Rassak was part of Al-Qaeda. A closer look at his video, though, showed he was actually being tortured by Al-Qaeda. The confusion over the video collection found in an Al-Qaeda safehouse is one of the stranger twists in the unusual case of Rassak, a detainee at the US Navy base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. On Monday, a federal judge ordered Rassak released, chastising the government for claiming he was still part of the same terror network that tortured, imprisoned and abandoned him. US District Judge Richard Leon emphatically rejected the government's claims against Rassak, even going so far as to add punctuation to get his point across. Federal prosecutors had argued that even though Rassak was tortured by Al-Qaeda as a suspected Western spy and imprisoned by the Taleban for a year and a half, he still maintained some kind of allegiance to his tormentors. “I disagree!” wrote the judge, adding that US officials are “taking a position that defies common sense.” The judge said the government and the US media initially mistook Rassak as one of a number of suicide martyrs based on videotapes captured at an Al-Qaeda safehouse. Further investigation found the tape actually showed Al-Qaeda torturing him. In a 13-page decision, the judge heaped scorn on the suggestion that Rassak could be part of the same terrorist organizations that had abused him. Rassak, a Syrian, had admitted to US interrogators that in 2000, he stayed for several days at a guesthouse used by Taliban and Al-QaEda fighters, where he helped clean weapons, and then briefly attended a terror training camp. “There is no evidence – from either side – as to why he suddenly was suspected by Al-QaEda leaders of spying and was tortured for months into giving a false confession,” Leon wrote. “It is highly unlikely that by that point in time Al-Qaeda (or the Taleban) had any trust or confidence in him. Surely extreme treatment of that nature evinces a total evisceration of whatever relationship might have existed!” One of the detainee's lawyers, Steven Wax, said the judge's decision “is yet another reminder that there are innocent men in Guantanamo.”
