Abhisit Vejjajiva – a patrician 44-year-old with an Oxford education – became Thailand's prime minister on Monday amid hopes that he can calm the political storms that have battered the country for the past three years. But untested at the pinnacle of power and said to lack decisiveness, he could face one of the roughest rides in modern Thai history. Abhisit, who heads the former opposition Democrat Party, defeated a loyalist of exiled but still powerful ex-prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra in a parliamentary vote. The parliamentary contest came in the wake of mass protests by anti-Thaksin forces that included a weeklong siege of Bangkok's airports. Now, Abhisit must try to neutralize Thaksin's supporters, who have vowed to take to the streets themselves, grapple with a dramatic economic downturn and keep intact the fragile coalition of small parties that brought him to power. “Abhisit is untested and that is both good and bad. He has a clean record. He is well-educated, eloquent and principled so the public will likely give him a chance,” says Panithan Wattanayagorn, a political scientist at Bangkok's Chulalongkorn University. But Panithan said Abhisit has yet to outline a bold solution to Thailand's manifold problems. “That is his weakness and that lack of decisiveness and clear political stance could turn against him very quickly,” he said. “It's going to be among Thailand's roughest premierships.” Many Thais, especially in the countryside, favor earthy, charismatic politicians. Abhisit, who counts “Myth of Sisyphus” by French existential novelist Albert Camus among his favorite books, lacks such grit. Thaksin, by contrast, used to travel through the countryside, speaking the farmers' language and listening to their hardships. “It's very difficult to imagine Abhisit in that same kind of performance with the same kind of results. He's a rather cool character. Thaksin is hot and open,” said Chris Baker, a political scientist at Bangkok's Chulalongkorn University. “Of course he (Abhisit) can change. Power changes people enormously.” The rural-urban divide, which in large measure led to the current crisis, was clearly evident in reactions to Abhisit's victory. “This is very bad for poor people. Abhisit was born with silver spoons and forks in his mouth. He knows nothing but wealth and privilege. How could he solve our problems?” said Chaiya Paitoonsiri, a taxi driver from the impoverished northeastern province of Maha Sarakam. But a 26-year-old office worker in Bangkok, Nutta Tangtrakulchai, said, “It's nice to have someone smart for a change. He is also an economist so he should be savvy about solving the country's most important problem.”
