What does the meeting of Turkey's Minister of Exterior and Hillary Clinton, the American Minister, recommends when discussions subject focused on Syria after Al-Assad's era? Will this meeting stimulate a real work in regard to unifying the Opposition and supporting it, together with the Free Army? The United States' justification for not supporting the Syrian revolution was based on incorrect fears which exaggerated the rumor of the regime of that what follows it shall be a civil war through which Al-Qaeda & Extremist Islamic forces are going to sneak. However, the same claims have been declared in the previous cases of Tunisia, Libya & Egypt where we have seen the Islamists ruling some of these countries without adopting the methodology of Al-Qaeda. The latest attack on Rafah Border Crossing point by some Extremist Islamists created a strong Egyptian & Arab feeling against the terrorists. In the Syrian case, even if some Islamists are fighting Al-Assad or some revenge cases are going to occur due to the previous massacre of Hama, in addition the war occurring between the Free Army & the official army; a code of honor gas been signed by which it has been promised that the other minorities are not going to be subjected to isolation or killing, except for those who have been involved in the genocide, regardless of the sect they belong to. The other justification is the Russians & Chinese use of the VITO right. However, this justification did neither prevent the United States earlier from entering into a war against Gaddafi, nor from seizing North Korea & Kosovo economically, as long as the two countries are involved in arming the Syrian regime and providing it with supplies. Considering the above, what is it that prevents the United States from providing the support through light forces for protecting the Syrian citizens, in a similar way to what it was doing in Afghanistan through the time of its war against the Soviet Union. All what the Syrians seek are some missiles, ammunition & advanced communication devices which are impenetrable by the Syrian regime. In regard to Turkey, many duties are expected from it as depending on the diplomacy only is rejected by both parties of the relationship. Al-Assad regime's use of the Kurds issue through arming the Kurds for separating themselves from Syria and establishing their state has not been born recently. Al-Assad did not even consider them citizens when he has been refusing to provide them with Syrian identity cards. If Turkey had started its support to the Free Army earlier, such penetration would not have happened. In general, the drowned does not fear becoming wet. This means that Al-Assad's regime is working clearly on fragmenting Syria but this action shall be valueless if a parallel army was there to control the security after Al-Assad's era. What shall Clinton's visit & the media hustle that accompanied it be explained? Are we before a serious and crucial action that shall raise the support from being verbal towards being actual or practical through departing the Security Council stage and moving towards a dual American-Turkish cooperation which shall be followed by a European one later? Or do they represent signs of pressure applied on Russia & China to show them that they (i. e. the West) have their own applicable agenda? The Free Army has imposed its Existence and started to launch the battles through new tactics while its support is coming from the interior of Syrian now through the soldiers who are running away from the official army or through arms stores and warehouses, in addition to the amounts received from external resources. However, these arms are still not enough due to that the Syrian regime owns heavy vehicles, aircraft and missiles and is compensating and destroyed weapon from the Russian arsenal and its fleets which are docked on the Syrian shores for supporting the official army. In order to save Syria from other risks and gaining the Syrian nation which is bearing the biggest burden and direct pressure; the United States shall be heading the salvation front for saving this nation and proving that it represents a tool for freeing the nations from their dictators, instead of standing aside, watching and monitoring only, as such behavior outraged all the people or parties which who / which are sympathizing with the Syrian nation & led them to be angry from the United States and its allies.
