I don't oppose anyone of those that are experiencing the pains of the situations in some Arab countries, where the republic authorities in the crisis countries since it started are ultimate dictatorships and violent, and it is not logical that the period of ruling extends to nearly a third of a century or more, and it is supposed that the local media be an enlightening tool for the citizen and stopping the leader from what is happening of chaos. These countries didn't live its social failure and economic backwardness and giving the poverty and employment the widest presence spaces if it didn't live under the oppressive sect life that was not satisfied with individual violence only, but it also took it into unjustified enmities. Furthermore, it is not a part of freedom contents or democracy claim at all to contain the social classes views and support it with provoking nonobjective enmities. If China or India opened the door in front of the individual or commercial media so that this media profits from the development of clashes then they wouldn't be able to reach the advanced positions that they are at now. Unfortunately, in our Arab world and since the beginnings of the revolutionary republics there were no real freedoms, not even 1% of democracy freedoms except for claim manifestations. A TV channeled hosted me weeks ago to talk about Yemen and I explained my viewpoint that Yemen is a country of tribal conflicts, and that the kingdom can't cooperate with one side against the other, and they repeated the questions through the discussion, why don't the Kingdom interfere and enforces the will of the citizens in this country? I said: what citizens, what did Hothis do before them, and if you wanted this nonobjective interference why don't you request America with an objective interference that is absent since sixty years about the rights of the Palestinian citizens, and we want to understand if Israel can practice what it has of tyranny control if it was not for the American support? Before two days an Arab TV channel hosted me, and it asked me why Saudi allowed the president Saleh to go back to Yemen? Why was not he arrested? And I said that he came as a president and he traveled back in the same way, and it is not Saudi's right to take a deterring position against him, where he has supporters and fighters, bad circumstance and unlawful presidency, but Riyadh has nothing to do with it. He said: how do you justify Saudi's containment of the arrival of the Tunisian resident then the treatment of the Yemeni president and its flexibility to accept Mubarak if it traveled to it? I said: you can add other names; where this is a humanistic side only and not political, and the evidence is that the Tunisian president was not a relations friend with the Kingdom. They said: why are the freedoms and democracies not supported? I said: this is your concern, where we, since one hundred years, didn't have any family where a member of it disappeared because of a political kidnapping or was found killed in the street by an anonymous. Yes, for more than one hundred years we didn't live this type of bloody democracy and violence, they got pissed and stopped the discussion. I write this for the citizen for him to see others carefully and to constantly thank Allah for his presence in a place of peace, safety and development.
