In Iraq, after colonization, the sectarian and tribal trend prevails anything national. Some declarations came out to prove that Iraq is not one of the Arabs and the Arabian era was just colonization although it is one of the League of Arab States and all its corporations and committees. It cannot block the borders with Arab countries that do not deny their Arabism. However, the one who gains sectarian profits politically and financially attempted to block the Arabism, politically and morally, by declaring the dependency to USA and Iran. Iraq wants to hold the Arabic Summit in it; yet the welcoming prevails the caution about the security conditions in this country. When the first sectarian bubble explodes in Bahrain, Iraq government and parliament decided to side with Iran supporting the sectarian trend. As a quick response, Gulf countries requested the cancellation or the deferment of this summit. What is happening in Bahrain is an internal affair. How can you explain the conflicts and explosions in Iraq which dressed sectarianism in the full sense of the word? Nobody appeared to prefer Sunni side to Shiites or vice versa as a direct result of the colonization which overturned the standards. The Iraqi characteristic must deny the polarization policies; but the last elections proved that the formation is made in Tehran. So, the objection to Bahrain affairs synchronized with Iranian provocation followed by Iraq government and parliament. This proves that Iraq independence will not be completed even after USA troops lift it. We must not forget the Shiites Arab in Ahwaz is treated, because they are Arabs, badly with the worst types of elimination, ostracism and contempt. Iran blesses the Shiites rule all over the world, and its perspective will not be different toward the Shiites Arab in Iraq or Ahwaz because the Aryan superiority complex and the attempt to deform the previous Mesopotamia civilizations to make it the born of Persia, and that the Persian roots excels racially and culturally the Arabian roots and civilizations in the whole region from the ocean to the Arabian Gulf. In this case, Iraq must discuss its own sovereignty because its Arabian roots are historically stronger and must consider in the far future the sectarian trends which consider its people lower than racist Persian purity. Perhaps the failure of the Arab Summit is a dangerous indicator which increases Iran interests by separating the regional and national parts. As Iraq miscalculated the complex results, Hezbollah raised its protest against the existence of Al Jazeera Troops in Bahrain; this time Bahrain reconsidered the eviction of Lebanese fearing any negative consequences and it was right. The sectarian voice is louder than national interests. Perhaps the manipulation of the sovereignty of any country will raise the security to its maximum level. As Iraq made a big mistake, Hezbollah just repeats Tehran declarations. This is sectarian not Arabian crisis.
