I wrote last week about the neocons and the Likudniks in and around the administration of George W. Bush, who falsified the premises for a war on Iraq which took the lives of one million Arabs and Muslims. As an example of these people, I chose Michael Ledeen, because of his extremism, and his history in Italy and suspicions of his involvement in the forgery of the Niger documents about Iraq's attempt to acquire uranium from Niger, or what's known as yellowcake. I had mentioned John Bolton as well, and cited him in a book about neocons and Christian Zionists. Today, I return to the former U.S. ambassador to the UN as yet another example of the evil cabal, after having read an article he wrote about the upcoming vote at the UN General Assembly over Palestinian statehood. The article has in fact managed to embody the combined insolence of all the enemies of peace, from the fascist government of Israel to its advocates in the United States. As a reminder, John Bolton is an American Likudnik, who mercurially alternated among the State Department, the Justice Department, and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) - all in the service of Israel. He was once the Undersecretary of state for arms control and international security, in which capacity he focused on Iran while turning a blind eye to Israel, even though the former possesses no nuclear arms while the latter has a full nuclear arsenal. Beyond public service, Bolton worked with extremist Likudnik institutions such as the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), which lobbied for a war on Iraq in the nineties, the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), and the American Enterprise Institute. Recently, he launched a group to influence the U.S. presidential election campaigns, i.e. yet another Likudnik gang. In 2001, Bolton flew to Europe to demand the resignation of José Bustani from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, even when Bustani had been unanimously voted in to his post the year before for a second term, with the support of the United States and U.S. Secretary of State at the time Colin Powell, who had praised Bustani's work. Bolton's request was denied, and denounced by an administrative court of the United Nations. Perhaps also some of the readers will remember Bolton's war against Dr. Mohamed ElBaradei during his tenure as head of the IAEA. However, Bolton was soon to be answered by the Nobel Prize Committee, which awarded ElBaradei and his agency the Nobel Peace Prize in 2005. Bolton is so insolent that the Senate itself refused to approve his appointment as the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, prompting George W. Bush to appoint him to this post on 1/8/2005 during Congress's recess. This is despite the fact that Bolton once said that if the UN was to lose ten stories from its 38-storey headquarters in New York, this would not make any difference. Moving on to what we are witnessing at present, the Israeli government and its gang in America, in addition to the other extremists, are claiming today that the vote over Palestinian statehood at the UN General Assembly does not matter. So I ask here, if it does not matter, then why are the extremists this much fixated upon this issue? Bolton wrote an article on the subject in the Los Angeles Times, which ran it along with an editorial by Moussa Abu Marzook from Hamas. The article betrayed Bolton's extremism. In the first line, he wrote that Barack Obama is the most anti-Israel American President since 1948, to which I say Amen, hoping that for once in his life, Bolton is being honest. He continues in the same paragraph by saying that if Obama does not act, then other will have to act, and proposed that the United States should threaten to stop paying its contributions to the UN. However, I say here that New York City thrives on the foreign delegations visiting the UN headquarters. Every dollar the United States pay to the UN is paid back to it threefold, all while the evil cabal, which has brought bankruptcy upon the U.S. treasury in its losing incursions, still insists on bringing more ruin to America, all in the course of their servitude to Israel. Bolton claimed that a resolution [on Palestinian statehood] will be bitter and frustrating, likening it to the ‘Zionism Is Racism' Act, and proposing that such a resolution be ignored lest the UN delegitimize itself. My response here is to say that it is Israel that is illegitimate, unless the Palestinians, the true owners of the entire land, accept it, since the land from the sea to the river belongs to them alone, ant not to the Khazari thieves. Nevertheless, Bolton warns that the resolution may create ‘facts on the grounds' through the United Nations. This, mind you, comes from an Israeli agent who knows that Israel's entire existence is predicated on similar facts on the grounds, as currently epitomized by settlement building with the purpose of altering demographic and geographic realities in the Occupied Territories. Bolton then repeats his call on the U.S. President to cut off financial contributions to the UN if the resolution is passed, and reminds his readers that accepting the admission of a state must be done through both the General Assembly and the Security Council. Further, Bolton believes that the entire UN is unimportant, and he wants the five permanent members of the Security Council to ‘run' the world. Bolton then concludes by saying that the resolution will ruin the UN itself. But I say that it would rather ruin the legitimacy of Israel, which the whole world has now begun to question because Israel was never legitimate. Instead, it was established so that the Palestinian Arabs may pay the price for the Christian West's crimes against the Jews. As a result, the West committed another crime, this time against the people of Palestine. [email protected]
