ON April 21, Ali Reda, head of the Touristic Investment Authority in the Red Sea, voiced the objection of the authority's board of directors, the owners of hotels and tourist facilities, and tourism sector staff to the Egyptian government's plan to use coal as an alternative source of energy. He underlined the damage that would specifically befall this coastal part of the country if the plan is implemented. “Coal will be detrimental to tourism in the Red Sea,” he said in a press statement. “It will pollute the environment, harm people's health, and destroy marine life especially coral reefs.” Reda specifically objected to importing coal through Safaga, a major Red Sea port, since, he argued, the resulting damage would also extend to the infrastructure. “The highways in this area are not fit for the transportation of coal from Safaga so the roads will be substantially damaged,” he said. “Add to that a remarkable increase in road accidents.” Ahmed Droubi, coordinator of the Egyptians Against Coal movement, agreed with this last point: “Eight million tons of coal a year would require 250,000 to 500,000 trucks on our roads carrying coal. Can you imagine that?” Coal critics Reda and the tourism sector he represents constitutes the latest addition to a long list of critics of the Egyptian government's decision to import coal for powering cement factories. Approved by the Egyptian cabinet on April 2, the decision followed a significant cut in natural gas supplies to cement factories to solve the problem of frequent power outages that, occurring almost on a daily basis, had been subjecting government performance to scathing criticism. During the meeting in which the decision was made, the cabinet stressed its “commitment to all precautionary measures recommended by the World Health Organization and to enforcing those measures on all facilities that manufacture, import, transport, store, or use coal,” according to the cabinet's official statement. The government, the statement added, would also work on modifying the environmental law so that violating facilities would be penalized. “A tax will also be imposed on factories that use coal.” Minister of Environmental Affairs Laila Iskander said: “I have failed to convince the government to retract its decision to import coal. My team and I were unable to make them see the magnitude of the hazards of importing coal and the environmental disaster that would follow.” Iskander, who warned that using coal as a source of energy would turn Egypt into “a carbon state,” said that despite the objections, the ministry will have to do its part if coal is to be imported anyway. “We cannot allow divisions within the government and have to work together,” she said. “What can be done now is setting the environmental rules that should regulate importing, transporting, storing, and using coal. We are working on that now.” Iskander explained that three teams in the ministry are working on a plan to minimize the harm of coal. “The first team is working on modifying the environmental law, the second on setting requirements and regulations, and the third on preparing for the measurement of harmful coal emissions,” she said. Commenting on the third team's job, Iskander said the ministry still needs to procure the necessary equipment. “This needs to be done as soon as possible.” Iskander is to be subpoenaed on May 10 by the Administrative Court for the lawsuit filed by leftist activist and rights lawyer Khaled Ali against the cabinet's decision to import coal. Ali's lawsuit is part of an expansive campaign launched by a number of activists and rights organizations to stop the import of coal. Blind eye to the disaster A joint statement by several rights and environmental groups accused the government of giving in to pressure by cement factories while turning a blind eye to the disastrous impact of coal on Egypt and its citizens. “Cement investors are waging a political and media war to push the government to overlook the hazards of using coal through taking advantage of the current energy crisis and promising to reduce cement prices in return,” said the statement. “The cabinet is siding with those investors and ignoring the studies that underline the grave consequences of such a decision.” In addition to the general environmental hazards, the statement specifically highlighted the impact of using coal on residents of areas surrounding cement factories, and which is expected to last for several generations. The signatories expressed their surprise that while the world's biggest industrial countries are moving away from coal, Egypt insists on using it. “In Germany, 61% of energy used in the cement industry is generated from waste and in the Netherlands, the percentage rose to 98% in 2009.” According to the statement, several developing countries are also working on long-term plan to discard polluting sources of energy. “Kenya is expected to generate 50% of its energy from solar energy by 2016 while Morocco will generate 42% of its energy from renewable sources by 2020.” Egyptians Against Coal, one of the signatories of the above statement, emerged as the most vocal opponent to the use of coal. Comprised of rights activists and environmental experts, the group launched a campaign to underline the damaging effects of coal. According to a statement issued by the group, the only beneficiary of the cabinet's decisions are cement investors whose profits will skyrocket after using a cheap source of energy such as coal. The main loser is the Egyptian people, whose health will suffer drastically. “Coal affects the brain, the nerves, the lungs, and the blood. Research proved that inhaling coal dust causes redox reactions and increases chances of lung cancer, blood viscosity, and narrowed blood vessels.” All these effects, the statement explained, are the result of being around coal, and before even starting the process of burning it to generate power. — Al Arabiya News
