To the “hard jihad” of Muslim terrorism and the non-violent, “stealth jihad” challenging Western societies, the oxymoron “love jihad” can now be added. But this latest form of Islamist aggression has nothing to do with love but rather, like its soul-mates, with hatred for the infidel and women. The above is the first paragraph of an article that is as despicable as its writer, and which was published by an extremist Jewish-American website specializing in attacking Islam and Muslims. The same article also alleged that Muslims in India lure girls into the hands of Muslim fundamentalists with [false] marriage proposals. My comment on this is that any comparison between different religions cannot possibly end in favour of Judaism, which if it is to be compared to Christianity and Islam, would appear as a violent and genocidal religion that calls for war crimes, brutal punishment, prostitution, forgery and lying. In any case, the issue that I want to tackle today in my article is not comparative religion, although I personally sometimes appear in the Arab and Muslim worlds as if I am the only one who follows up the activities of the enemies of Islam, while most Muslims are preoccupied with the Hijab and the Niqab. Do the readers remember the name Laurent Murawiec? He was the writer of “The Mind of Jihad”. The same website mentioned above published the news of his death the day before publishing the above-mentioned article, may God not have mercy on his soul nor ever forgive him. In short, Islamic radicalism according to his views cannot be separated from Islam itself, and that the West is subsequently facing an immense danger with Jihad's ability to easily attract followers. The readers have probably never heard of this book. Nevertheless, some of them might remember how Murawiec, while he was heading an advisory group affiliated with the Department of Defence, called on the United States to seize the Saudi oil wells and to target the Saudi financial institutions. I would not have written about this Jewish French-American Likudnik had he been the only one to have died. However, the neoconservatives have lost two of their prominent figures in only two months: Irving Kristol passed away on the 18th of September, and his death was shortly followed by that of William Safire on the 27th of the same month. The only thing I can say about these extremists and their ilk is what my mother, rest in peace, used to say when she heard of the death of an enemy of Arabs and Muslims (such as Menachem Begin or Yitzhak Shamir); she would thus always say: “May God Dig His Grave Even Deeper!” Irving Kristol is the godfather of - and the most rotten among - all neoconservatives. This is unless we consider his son to be even more rotten than his father. Like all the other members of the gang of evil, Kristol began as liberal leftist (he was a Trotskyist) and ended up as a far-right warmonger, without actually being either: Every member of this gang is a staunch supporter of Israel, and as such, would serve the interests of Israel at the expense of those of his own country, sacrificing America's youths to protect the so-called security of Israel. For this reason, the readers might find that both the departed members of that gang and those alive have supported the war on Afghanistan and the war in Iraq, and have called, and still are, for an American war against Iran - despite the fact that it is impossible for Iran to ever pose a threat against the United States. Irving Kristol's name has since been associated with the magazines that he had founded or of which he was the editor-in-chief such as “Commentary”, “Encounter”, “Public Interest” (which was closed last spring after 44 years of extremism and hatred) and “National Interest”. These in fact are all anti-Arab and anti-Muslim publications that hide their extremism with a cultural and intellectual veneer, and whose sole cause is the promotion of Israel. He then helped his son publish “the Weekly Standard”, the mouthpiece of the neoconservatives. Moreover, Irving Kristol is still despicable even when tackling other issues away from Israel. He was against the poor and had written a book in which he attacked the culture of poverty; he was also behind the bill “reforming” social welfare in 1996 and which denied the American poor any governmental assistance for more than five years. Nobody's death ever pleases me; however, I admit that I was not saddened by the death of those extremists. William Safire then shortly died after Kristol, and newspapers wrote tens and maybe hundreds of articles about him; however, my opinion is that this is a lot of mourning for someone who does not deserve it. Safire was just another Israeli who rooted for Israel as the latter was committing war crimes and murdering women and children. Also, he was a dear friend of Ariel Sharon, who used to constantly supply him with news – which makes me consider Safire an accomplice and an inciter. In fact, he has always maintained his rejection that the United States should pursue a “balanced” policy towards both the Palestinians and Israel because “No nation or international group can be an honest broker between a democracy under attack and a terrorist coalition on the march”. Nevertheless I used to always read one of his articles entitled “on language” tackling the English language and which I found to be useful. All I want to say here is that while I am not gloating over his death, I praise God for it, and add that there is a terrorist alliance between Israel and the American neoconservatives who sold their country or betrayed it in the service of Israel. In what regards the “[Israeli] democracy” that Safire and other members of his gang are talking about, Israel has now instead become the most resented country in the world; had Safire, Kristol and Murawiec lived longer, they would have read the report of Judge Richard Goldstone, a Jewish judge, and what he wrote about the Israeli war crimes and even perhaps the Israeli genocide. This report has been forwarded to the United Nations whose General Assembly, i.e. the whole world, has condemned Israel more than any other country since the Hebrew state is the state of crime, owing to the dead neoconservative criminals and those alive; the mills of God grind slowly, yet they grind exceeding small.
